T.s. eliot prufrock analysis

Eliot weaves these allusions seamlessly into the fabric of the poem, enriching its layers of meaning. Prufrock grapples with the idea of time slipping away, a sense of missed opportunities, and the relentless march toward old age and death. Alfred Prufrock. Love, or rather the lack thereof, is a central theme in the poem. Gender roles and identity play a significant role in the poem.

Prufrock grapples with societal expectations and the fear of emasculation, which further adds to his sense of inadequacy. The poem explores themes of self-doubt, the fear of societal judgment, and the human struggle for connection and meaning. It encourages readers to confront their own insecurities and reflect on the complexities of the human condition.

It sets the tone for the themes of love, longing, and self-reflection that permeate the narrative. Eliot employs a wide array of literary devices, including symbolism, imagery, allusions, irony, and figurative language. It reflects the anxieties, disillusionment, and societal shifts of the modernist era. Prufrock embodies the modernist sensibility through his fragmented thoughts, internal struggles, and existential angst.

His character reflects the disillusionment and alienation prevalent in modernist literature. Its rich symbolism, vivid imagery, and universal appeal make it a work of enduring significance. Curiously, many biographers of T. Tennyson and Browning virtually invented this new form of poetry in the s and s, and their names were synonymous with it.

We cannot always be sure that what he is confiding to us is actually being uttered: we may instead have a direct line to his thoughts, to the inside of his head. And this is before we even begin to analyse the significance of Prufrock comparing himself to John the Baptist…. He is perhaps slightly pretentious and affected, given the styling of his name in the title as J.

Prufrock also seems reluctant to grasp the nettle and proposition any of the women he meets at the social functions he attends — those women who talk of Michelangelo, for instance. But we cannot advance much more than this with real confidence. Like all great works of art, it remains open to new interpretations and can mean lots of different things to different readers.

This is a key part of modernist poetry and, indeed, the modernist fiction of figures such as Virginia Woolf and James Joyce , and is an attempt by modernist writers to encourage us to confront the realities of the modern world. After all, how well do we know our friends? For this reason, there are many aspects of the poem which resist easy analysis.

The Italian original can be translated as follows:. If I but thought that my response were made to one perhaps returning to the world, this tongue of flame would cease to flicker. But since, up from these depths, no one has yet returned alive, if what I hear is true, I answer without fear of being shamed. This is another key feature of much modernist poetry: literary allusion, often to very specific texts which only a highly educated reader would be able to recognise.

Guido is in Hell the Inferno , addressing these lines to Dante himself and telling him that the only reason he feels comfortable in confessing his deepest, darkest sins to the poet is that he knows that nobody who is in Hell alongside him can go and tell everyone back in the land of the living about them.

T.s. eliot prufrock analysis

So, with that in mind, we might surmise that Eliot wishes us to see Prufrock as somehow confessing something, as confiding something which he feels shame about his difficulties with girls, perhaps. The temptation to identify the poet with the poem is a powerful one. Eliot certainly understood that, and a poem on the order of Prufrock begs the question.

Any poet writes out of what he knows, but that is the end of it. Nor it is merely playing with words or coining a coy phrase to talk of a poetic imagination. That is to say, they are intended not to inform or to persuade but to engage the reader in the processes of creation and thereby force the reader to make sense not of the social or personal or psychological but of the delicate balances among perception, experience, and language that form, for the most part, what is generally called reality.

That may seem to be an immense, almost impossible task for the poet to take upon himself, let alone credit to a work of literature, but that is what Eliot the poet is out to achieve and that is what certainly makes this particular poem one of the earliest masterworks of literary modernism, as Ezra Pound so astutely observed it to be. Prufrock the person is not even a characterization; rather, he is a verbal construct, a creature made up of words, as Hamlet once said, and thus far less substantial than even a phantom of smoke and air.

Without diminishing the more or less full-bodied individual who nevertheless emerges from the words, their tone and color and mood, it is not difficult to imagine that, rather than any truly living being, Prufrock represents, embodies, the masculine principle, self-centered and vain, awash in a sea of feminine reserve that is itself closeted and yet somehow inviting, certainly alluring.

Whether Prufrock is a man obsessed by women or by their apparent lack of interest in him, or he is a person dissatisfied with his station in life or with the life that fate has dealt with, or he is an individual uncertain of his sexual identity or simply a lonely person craving only a sympathetic ear, his importance as a literary creation rests on what his condition reveals of the human condition.

Prufrock is that not-untypical human creature at odds with both himself and his social and physical environment who is struggling nevertheless to find an accommodating reality or even just an accommodating point of view whereby he might be at peace with himself and at ease in the world. Primarily his is the desire to be accepted not for what but for who he is, but he appears weak and indecisive because he knows that he is unable to reconcile that dilemma himself.

Only others can, so he winds up imagining that his only hope is to get away from everyone else. There are worse awakenings than his. No one likes to be a specimen, his nerves displayed for all the world to see, and Prufrock knows that. But Eliot, by having made his creation a specimen of what it is to be alive and to be human, exposes his readers to the very sorts of lessons that only great art can teach—enduring lessons in the human heart.

It is through this careful examination and exposure of a single human being that Eliot introduces not some preconceived thematic considerations or universal truths to his readers so much as the means humans devise to cope as social beings. Such means become a constant theme in Eliot, albeit a necessarily unstated one. Eliot: The Design of His Poetry.

Everett, Barbara. Gardner, Helen. The Art of T. New York: Dutton, Kenner, Hugh. The Invisible Poet: T. New York: McDowell, Obolensky, Manganiello, Dominic. Eliot and Dante. London: Macmillan, Matthiessen, F. The Achievement of T. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Ricks, Christopher, ed. Inventions of the March Hare: Poems —, by T. New York: Harcourt, Sigg, Eric.

The American T. Eliot: A Study of the Early Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Smith, Grover. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, Unger, Leonard. Eliot: Moments and Patterns. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, Alfred Prufrock , Analysis of T. Alfred Prufrock , Bibliography of T. Alfred Prufrock , Character Study of T.

Alfred Prufrock , Criticism of T. Alfred Prufrock , Essays of T. Alfred Prufrock , Notes of T. Alfred Prufrock , Plot of T. Alfred Prufrock , Simple Analysis of T.